CIS500 Strayer Implementation Strategies In Organisations Memo Please see attached files.Memo must be 3-5 pages long.References are listed on the attached. | Homework Answers

CIS500 Strayer Implementation Strategies In Organisations Memo Please see attached files.Memo must be 3-5 pages long.References are listed on the attached.Please include cover page. CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making
Case Study 2: Implementation Strategies
Due Week 7 and worth 175 points
Your proposed information system is still a contender. The executives, however, are asking whether it is
too limited to prevent the shadow IT projects that continue to take place throughout the organization.
They believe that you have considered what the organization does now, but how will your system adapt to
new products and processes? Read IQMS (2015) for a concrete example of what they mean.
You’ll have to quell their fears, so it’s time for another memo. Please focus on these points:
1. Identify any significant changes that your organization might reasonably make in its product
offerings in the next 3 years. Explain the competitive benefits of this change.
2. Explain how your information system addresses or can adapt to the introduction of these new
product offerings.
3. Give one reason why capabilities for the new product offerings should or should not be
incorporated in the initial information system design. Justify your reason.
This memo should be 3–5 pages long.
Reference:
IQMS. (2015). Quick Response Manufacturing Yields Lower Inventories & Improves cash flow. Retrieved
from https://www.iqms.com/files/case-studies/quick-response-manufacturing.pdf.
© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information
and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
Strayer University.
CIS 500
Page 1 of 3
CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and
language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 175
Criteria
1. Identify any significant
changes in its product
offerings that your
organization might
reasonably make over
the next 3 years. Explain
the competitive benefits
of this change.
Case Study 2: Implementation Strategies
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
Inadequate
prediction of
changes in product
offerings
Somewhat
predicted changes
in product offerings.
Predicted significant
changes in product
offerings
Somewhat
explained the
competitive benefits
of this change in
product offerings.
Explained the
competitive benefits
of these changes in
product offerings
Described the
sustainability of the
information system
against any
potential changes in
the marketplace
Explained how the
information system
addresses new
product offerings
Explained how the
information system
addresses the
introduction of each
new product
offering
Limited explanation
of competitive
benefits of change
in product offerings
Weight: 30%
(52.5 points)
2. Explain how your
information system
addresses or can adapt
to the introduction of
these new product
offerings.
Weight: 30%
(52.5 points)
3. Give one reason why
capabilities for the new
product offerings should
or should not be
incorporated in the initial
information system
design. Justify your
reason.
Weight: 30%
(52.5 points)
Did not explain how
the information
system addresses
new product
offerings
Inadequate
explanation of how
the information
system can adapt to
some of new
product offerings
Somewhat
described how the
information system
can adapt to some
of new product
offerings
Limited evaluation
of capabilities of
each product
offering
Somewhat
evaluated the
capabilities of each
product offering
Did not provide
adequate reason
why capabilities for
the new product
offerings should or
should not be
incorporated into
the initial system
design, and failed to
justify reasoning
Provided one
reason why
capabilities for the
new product
offerings should or
should not be
incorporated into
the initial system
design, but failed to
justify reasoning
Described how the
information system
can adapt to each
new product
offering
Evaluated the
capabilities of each
product offering
Provided one
reason why
capabilities for the
new product
offerings should or
should not be
incorporated into
the initial system
design. Justified the
reason.
Proposed ideas for
adapting the system
to change
Demonstrated what
considerations were
made for the
system to be
adaptable and
flexible to unknown
changes
Included insight on
how the system
could be adopted
by the IT
department
Provided more than
one reason why
capabilities for the
new product
offerings should or
should not be
incorporated into
the initial system
design. Justified the
reasoning.
© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information
and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
Strayer University.
CIS 500
Page 2 of 3
CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making
4. Clarity, persuasion,
proper communication,
writing mechanics, and
formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
(17.5 points)
Unclear structure,
not persuasive,
major grammatical
errors
Somewhat clear
structure, limited
persuasion,
grammatical errors,
language too simple
or too wordy
Clear structure,
persuasive writing,
minor or no
grammatical errors,
length and format
within requirements,
plain language
No grammatical
errors, plain
language,
organized by topic,
references business
needs, connects to
technical specs,
persuasive
© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information
and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
Strayer University.
CIS 500
Page 3 of 3
CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making
Assignment 2: The Presentation
Due Week 10 and worth 200 points
Congratulations. Your project has been staffed and you are about to meet with the team for the first time.
Initial impressions are important and you’ll need visuals for your presentation. Create a slide show (in
PowerPoint or similar software) in which you address the following, in this order:
1. Goals: What the project hopes to accomplish.
2. Critical Success Factors: Identify at least 4 different stakeholders; for each, list at least 2 things
that the stakeholder requires in order to deem the project successful.
3. Acquisition strategy: Should the system be built in-house, created by a contractor, purchased offthe-shelf and customized, or leased as a service? Explain your rationale.
4. Resources: For in-house development, what people/skills are required and what development
lifecycle do you recommend? Otherwise, identify 3 candidate organizations that can deliver the
system.
5. System functions: In a table format, summarize the types of users for the system; the business
reason(s) each would use the system; the ways that the system supports each of these needs;
and how this support differs from the current system.
6. Connectivity: Provide a diagram that shows how the system will connect to the other information
systems and what data flows among them.
7. Security: List the most serious cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities of the new system.
Suggest strategies to address them.
8. Mobility: Identify the system’s capabilities for mobile use.
Include a title and summary slide. Use one slide for each of the 8 points above. Include speaker notes or
audio narration that explains each slide more fully.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and
language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 200
Criteria
1. Goals: What the
project hopes to
accomplish.
Weight: 10%
(20 points)
2. Critical Success
Assignment 2: The Presentation
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
Did not
communicate what
the project hopes to
accomplish
Communicated
what the project
hopes to
accomplish
Communicated
what the project
hopes to
accomplish
Communicated
importance of
project reaching its
goals
Did not list project
goals
Did not list project
goals
Listed the project
goals
Connected project
goals to the
organizational
strategy
Did not identify 4
Identified 4
Identified 4
Identified and
© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information
and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
Strayer University.
CIS 500
Page 1 of 4
CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making
Factors: Identify at least
4 different stakeholders;
for each, list at least 2
things that stakeholder
requires in order to deem
the project successful.
stakeholders
stakeholders
stakeholders
Listed things to
make project
successful, but did
not connect each
stakeholder
Listed less than 2
things each
stakeholder would
require to deem
project successful
Listed 2 things that
each stakeholder
would require to
deem the project
successful
Did not compare
acquisition
strategies
Reasonable
comparison of
acquisition
strategies
Compared various
acquisition
strategies
Weight: 10%
(20 points)
3. Acquisition strategy:
Should the system be
built in-house, created by
a contractor, purchased
off-the-shelf and
customized, or leased as
a service? Explain the
rationale for your choice.
Weight: 10%
(20 points)
4. Resources: For inhouse development,
what people/skills are
required and what
development lifecycle do
you recommend?
Otherwise, identify 3
candidate organizations
that can deliver the
system.
Weight: 10%
(20 points)
Did not determine
the best strategy for
the proposed
information system
Determined which
acquisition strategy
would be the best
for the proposed
system
Explained why each
stakeholder would
be most interested
in 2 things to deem
project successful
Analyzed various
acquisition
strategies, or
presented an
acquisition strategy
that was not
previously
mentioned
Explained why
other acquisition
strategies would
potentially not work
Inadequately
explained the
rationale for
choosing the
acquisition strategy
Somewhat
explained the
rationale for
choosing the
acquisition strategy
Provided rationale
for choosing a
specific acquisition
strategy
Inadequately
determined
resources needed
for the acquisition
strategy
Determined
resources needed
for the acquisition
strategy, but did not
justify reasoning
Determined and
justified resources
needed for chosen
acquisition strategy
Presented
resources not
previously
considered
Limited
recommendation for
development
lifecycle for inhouse
development, or
three external
organizations that
can deliver the
system
Recommended a
project
development
lifecycle for inhouse
development, or
three external
organizations that
can deliver the
system, but did not
justify why they
were chosen
Recommended a
project
development
lifecycle for inhouse
development, or
three external
organizations that
can deliver the
system.
Included risk
identification and
mitigation
procedures
In table format:
In table format:
In table format:
Summarized some
Summarized the
Analyzed user
Inadequate
justification
5. System functions: In a
table format, summarize
the types of users for the
system; the business
Determined best
acquisition strategy
for the proposed
information system
justified the
selection of 4
stakeholders
Failed to put in
table format
Discussed cost
considerations
Proposed a
combination of
resources and
strategy to organize
stakeholder efforts
toward project
completion
© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information
and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
Strayer University.
CIS 500
Page 2 of 4
CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making
reason(s) each would
use the system; the ways
that the system supports
each of these needs; and
how this support differs
from the current system.
Weight: 10%
(20 points)
Inadequate
summary of users
for the system
of the types of
users for the
system
types of users for
the information
system
experience and
user design
considerations
Limited explanation
of why users would
use the system
Somewhat
explained business
reasons for system
use
Explained business
reasons why each
user type would use
the system
Explained design
changes that took
place between the
old and new system
Somewhat
described how the
system supports
users
Described how the
system supports the
needs of each user
type
Provided rationale
for the user types
identified
Reasonable
comparison of the
proposed system to
the old information
system
Determined how
this support differs
from the current
information system
In a diagram:
In a diagram:
In a diagram:
Showed other
information systems
that your system
would connect to,
but hard to follow
Showed other
existing information
systems that your
proposed system
would connect to
Showed how you
selected existing
systems that your
system would
connect to
Inadequate or hard
to follow the data
that would flow
among systems,
incomplete
Demonstrated what
data would flow
among systems, but
hard to follow
Demonstrated what
data would flow
between your and
other information
systems.
Explained how
diagram would be
updated and
maintained based
on changes in the
marketplace
Inadequate list of
cybersecurity
threats
Reasonable list of
cybersecurity
threats, failed to
show why they are
most serious
Listed the most
serious
cybersecurity
threats to your new
system
Proposed how your
new system would
integrate with
Shadow IT, if at all
Identified strategies
to address each
threat
Proposed strategies
to address each
threat
Identified your
system’s
capabilities for
mobile use, but not
comprehensive
Identified your
system’s
capabilities for
mobile use
Inadequate
description of how
system supports
users
Inadequate
comparison of the
proposed system to
the old system
6. Connectivity: Provide a
diagram that shows the
other information
systems this one will
connect to, and what
data flows among them.
Weight: 10%
(20 points)
7. Security: List the most
serious cybersecurity
threats and vulnerabilities
of the new system.
Suggest strategies to
address them.
Failed to put in
diagram format
Inadequate diagram
showing your
system, hard to
follow, incomplete
Inadequate
strategies to
address each threat
Weight: 10%
(20 points)
8. Mobility: Identify the
system’s capabilities for
mobile use.
Weight: 10%
Failed to identify
your system’s
capabilities for
mobile use,
incomplete
Discussed how to
reach out to user
types to test the
system
Demonstrated
strategies for
current users to
avoid threats
Proposed situations
in which mobile use
would happen and
situations where its
limitations
© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information
and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
Strayer University.
CIS 500
Page 3 of 4
CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making
(20 points)
9. Speaker / Audio
Notes: Include speaker
notes or audio narration
that explains each slide
more fully.
Inadequate speaker
notes or audio
narration, too much
or too little
information on each
slide provided
Somewhat detailed
speaker notes or
audio narration
explaining each
slide more fully
Included speaker
notes or audio
narration explaining
each slide more
fully
Discussed cost
considerations, and
risk identification &
mitigation
Weight: 10%
(20 points)
10. Clarity, persuasion,
proper communication,
writing mechanics, and
formatting requirements.
Weight: 10%
(20 points)
Speaker notes or
audio narration
succinct and direct,
persuasive
presentation
Unclear structure,
not persuasive,
major grammatical
errors
Somewhat clear
structure, limited
persuasion,
grammatical errors,
language too simple
or too wordy
Clear structure,
persuasive writing,
minor or no
grammatical errors,
length and format
within requirements,
plain language
No grammatical
errors, plain
language,
organized by topic,
references business
needs, connects to
technical specs,
persuasive
© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information
and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
Strayer University.
CIS 500
Page 4 of 4

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
CIS500 Strayer Implementation Strategies In Organisations Memo Please see attached files.Memo must be 3-5 pages long.References are listed on the attached. | Homework Answers
Get an essay WRITTEN FOR YOU, Plagiarism free, and by an EXPERT! To Get a 10% Discount Use Coupon Code FIRST39420
Order Essay
Calculator

Calculate the price of your paper

Total price:$26
Our features

We've got everything to become your favourite writing service

Need a better grade?
We've got you covered.

Order your paper