CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE PREVENTION OF TISSUE BREAKDOWN ON GRADE 2 PRESSURE ULCER AT SACRAL AREA OF PATIENT WITH FRAC | Free AI Content | Essay Helper

CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE PREVENTION OF TISSUE BREAKDOWN ON GRADE 2 PRESSURE ULCER AT SACRAL AREA OF PATIENT WITH FRAC TITLE IS CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE PREVENTION OF TISSUE BREAKDOWN ON GRADE 2 PRESSURE ULCER AT SACRAL AREA OF Pt. WITH FRACTURED PUBIC RAMI.THE HEALING PROCESS AND PREVENTION OF WOUND INFECTION. CASE: THE Author was caring for a 70 year old male patient with fractured pubic rami and has developed a grade 2 pressure ulcer at his sacral area after 3 days of his admission. The author has chosen the case to discuss because pressure ulcer is a common incident in her department which is orthopaedic ward due to poor mobility.NOTE: HOW CAN THE AUTHOR MAKE A DIFFERENCE OR IMPROVE THE CARE FOR PATIENT AS A SENIOR NURSE IN HER DEPARTMENT. NOTE: IN EVERY STATEMENT THERE SHOULD BE AN EVIDENCE OR REFERENCE TO SUPPORT THE STATEMENT.PLS. NOTE VERY IMPORTANT POINTS: PLS. ENSURE THE USE OF TERMINOLOGY IS CONSISTENT THROUGHTOUT THE ESSAY. WRITE THE ESSAY IN 3RD PERSON AND IN PAST TENSE. THE CRITICAL INCIDENT CHOSEN FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT WAS ON GRADE 2 PRESSURE ULCER OF PATIENT WITH FRACTURED PUBIC RAMI THE ASSIGNMENT SHOULD FOCUSE ON THE PREVENTION OF TISSUE BREAKDOWN. THE HEALING PROCESS AND PREVENTION OF WOUND INFECTION.THE CRITICAL INCIDENT IS ONE IN WHICH PERSONAL ACTION MADE A DIFFERENCE TO PATIENT OUTCOME;WHERE AN EVENT WENT UNUSUALLY WELL;WHEN THINGS DID NOT GO AS PLANNED;WHICH MAY BE ORDINARY AND TYPICAL;THAT IS PARTICULARLY DEMANDING SUGGESTED FRAMEWORK FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.THE CRITICAL INCIDENT: MUST PRESERVE CONFIDENTIALITY;INCLUDE AN INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH BRIEFLY DESCRIBING THE INCIDENT INDICATING THE PATIENT’S PRESENTATION AND RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF THE INCIDENT-ITS SIGNIFICANCE TO THE AUTHOR AS A SENIOR NURSE;IDENTIFY THE KEY CLINICAL ISSUES ARISING FROM THE INCIDENT;ANALYSE WHAT HAPPENED AND INTEGRATE THEORY AND RESEARCH WITH PRACTICE,THIS WILL REFLECT THE CARE OF THE AUTHOR TO HER PATIENT;CRITICALLY ANALYSE AUTHOR’S ACTION,DETERMINATION OF PRIORITIES OF TREATMENT AND OUTCOMES OF CARE;BE WELL PRESENTED,USING AN APPENDIX IF AUTHOR WISH TO GIVE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE INCIDENT THAT IS POSSIBLE WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE ASSIGNMENT;BE REFERENCE FULLY AND ACCURATELY USING HARVARD SYSTEM;DEMONSTRATE APPRPRIATE DEPTH AND BREADTH OF DISCUSSION OF KEY ISSUES;BE FOCUSED ON PRACTICE;DEMONSTRATE A QUESTIONING APPROACH TO PRACTICE AND THE LITERATURE USED TO INFORM PRACTICE;DEMONSTRATE COHERENT ARGUMENT AND CONCLUSION BASED ON EFFECTIVE CRITICAL Anlysis. AIM OF THE ASSIGNMENT IS TO FOCUS ON TISSUE VIABILITY AS IT RELATES TO AUTHOR’S OWN AREA OF HEALTH CARE PRACTICE. ANALYSE THE KEY ISSUES AS THEY RELATE TO THE TOPIC SELECTED. dEMONSTRATE THE ABILITY TO LINK THE ISSUES OF THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TO THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES IDENTIFIED IN THE LITERATURE e.g ASPECTS OF PATIENT CARE AND OR NURSE ROLE IN WOUND MANAGEMENT.DEMONSTRATE AN UNDERSTANDING OF BROADER ISSUES SUCH THE ROLE OF CLINICAL GUIDELINES,CLINICAL GOVERNANCE AND RELEVANT HEALTH CARE POLICY.ABILITY TO CRITICALLY ANALYSE CITED RESEARCH PAPERS(STRENGHT,WEAKNESSES AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS). ” Referencing Requirements: HARVARD STYLE AND SHOULD ENSURE REFERENCES ARE THE MOST CURRENT AVAILABLE OR SEMINAL. FROM 2007 TO 2012. 30 TO 35 REFERENCES. NOTE PLS. IN EVERY STATEMENT THERE SHOULD BE AN EVIDENCE OR REFERECE TO SUPPORT IT OR TO SUPPORT THE STATEMENT.