Mid-term Presentation ( Charlie Parker )

Rich in relevant content. Research supports and enhances a complete understanding of the topic

Relevant and appropriate content. Research supports a clear understanding of biographical information and genre clarification.

Acceptable content and relevant information. Some indications of adequate research and organization with regard to biographical and genre clarification

Lacking in relevant content and continuity. Extraneous data. Little evidence of effort in research, planning and organization.

PowerPoint slides draw the audience in and generate curiosity in the topic. Interesting visuals and excellent focus on talking points.

PowerPoint slides are easy to read and enhance the presenters’ information. Talking points only.

Acceptable visuals. Not too wordy and busy. Some interesting graphics and color design.

Poorly designed PowerPoint slides. Too wordy, difficult to see. Entire presentation on the slides.

No Marks

Complete accuracy in map and display of events. Analysis stand on it’s own and is easy to understand. Presenters offer enhancing commentary.

Accurate form analysis, and map. No errors in musical events. Analysis is easy to track.

Acceptable analysis design. Map has some errors. Presenters have only minimal commentary.

Numerous errors in form analysis. Not in map format. Lacking basic understanding of analysis data.

No Marks

Excellent preparation and collaborative effort. No reading, audience engagement and expert command of the topic.

Strong preparation and collaboration. No reading, and some audience engagement.

Indications of adequate preparation. Some reading, good balance and only minor presentation glitches

Obvious lack of preparation. Too much reading, mumbling and lack of topic knowledge.

No Marks