MKG 330 Colorado State Lifetime Employability – Workforce Trends Answer the following questions in a well-written paper. Be sure to provide detailed respon | Homework Answers

MKG 330 Colorado State Lifetime Employability – Workforce Trends Answer the following questions in a well-written paper. Be sure to provide detailed responses to these questions using specific examples. Integrate your answers into a paper that flows smoothly.

How are changes in today’s economy affecting the types of skills that employers will be seeking in the future?
What are the three changes in technology likely to have the greatest impact on the types of skills that employers will seek from job candidates?
What strategies can you employ to develop these skills in anticipation of these shifts?
What types of skills are enduring—that is, what job skills will always be in demand? What strategies are you pursuing to ensure you are developing these enduring job skills?

Your paper must:

Be 2-3 pages in length (not including the required title and references pages).
Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Include at least three outside sources. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these sources. 3/3/2019
Module 4: Critical Thinking
MKG330 Mod 4 CT
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/8041/assignments/150960?module_item_id=376925
1/4
3/3/2019
Module 4: Critical Thinking
Criteria
Requirements
Content
Critical Analysis
Ratings
5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Pts
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or
adequate knowledge of
employability using
specific examples?
correctly represents
knowledge from the
readings and sources.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant but
not major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge of
employability using
specific examples.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge of
employability
using specific
examples.
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical
analysis and
interpretation of the
questions pertaining to
lifetime employability.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major errors
or omissions in
analysis and
interpretation.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
analysis and
interpretation.
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/8041/assignments/150960?module_item_id=376925
5.0 pts
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of
employability.
10.0 pts
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to provide
critical analysis
and
interpretation of
the information
given.
15.0 pts
2/4
3/3/2019
Module 4: Critical Thinking
Criteria
Sources/Examples
Demonstrates
college­level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar, and
style
Ratings
5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples
meet required criteria
and are well chosen
to provide substance
and perspectives on
the questions
pertaining to lifetime
employability.
5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format, as
outlined in the
assignment.
Strong sentence
and paragraph
structure? few
errors in grammar
and spelling.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Sources or examples
meet required criteria
but are less than
adequately chosen to
provide substance
and perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Project is fairly well
organized and well
written, and is in proper
format, as outlined in
the
assignment.Reasonably
good sentence and
paragraph structure?
significant number of
errors in grammar and
spelling.
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/8041/assignments/150960?module_item_id=376925
Pts
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or
examples do not
meet required
criteria and/or are
poorly chosen to
provide substance
and perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Project is poorly
organized? does
not follow proper
paper
format.Inconsistent
to inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development?
numerous errors in
grammar and
spelling.
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Source or
example
selection
and
integration of
knowledge
from the
course are
clearly
deficient.
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Project is not
well organized
or well written,
and/or is not in
proper paper
format. Poor
quality work?
unacceptable
in terms of
grammar and
spelling.
5.0 pts
5.0 pts
3/4
3/3/2019
Module 4: Critical Thinking
Criteria
Demonstrates
proper use of APA
style
Ratings
5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains
proper APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU­Global Guide
to Writing & APA,
with no more than
one significant
error.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Few errors in APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU­Global Guide
to Writing & APA,
with no more than
two to three
significant errors.
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Significant errors
in APA formatting,
according to the
CSU­Global
Guide to Writing &
APA, with four to
five significant
errors.
Pts
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors
in APA formatting,
according to the
CSU­Global Guide
to Writing & APA,
with more than five
significant errors.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 45.0
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/8041/assignments/150960?module_item_id=376925
4/4

Purchase answer to see full
attachment