pick a scenario and make a decision based on it
Im trying to study for my English course and I need some help to understand this question.
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
- Textbook: Chapter 8; review previous chapters
- Ruggiero, V. R. (2012). Thinking critically about ethical issues (8th ed.). New York: Mc-Graw Hill.
- type in book title, then google books, once you click the link, go the search bar and search the chapters as needed. make sure to use book in paper AND 2 scholarly sources.
- Lesson
- Link (file): Memo Template . (ATTACHED BELOW)
- You Decide (See page in Week 6) (ATTACHED IN PICTURES)
- Minimum of 2 scholarly sources
Instructions
This assignment presents a difficult and painful medical dilemma, with you in an imagined professional role. Go through the You Decide scenario and make the decision it calls for. Then, compose an official memorandum that will be kept for the record and could potentially be read not only by your Peer Review Committee but also by those involved in charitable fundraising, which supports hospital development, as well as by others with financial interests in the decision.
In the memo (use the Memo Template), explain your decision and your reasoning for it. Include the following:
- Who benefits from what you decided? Explain why.
- Who gets denied a needed benefit? Explain why.
You will see notice that there is time pressure in the simulated situation, so remember that you would not have the luxury to dawdle in the decision-making process, and as the decision maker, you would not have the luxury of consulting a broad spectrum of advisors. It falls on you to decide!
Include in the memo the utilitarian ethical philosophy of John Stuart Mill (from the lesson last week) and one other ethical philosopher of your choosing that we have studied to date. Use both of those philosophies to bolster your decision.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
- Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
- 1-inch margins
- Double spaced
- 12-point Times New Roman font
- Title page
- References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)
Grading
This activity will be graded based on Ethical Analysis Grading Rubric.
Rubric
Week 5
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMemo format |
|
5.0 pts |
||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhich patient was chosen and why. |
|
15.0 pts |
||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhy the other patients were rejected. |
|
15.0 pts |
||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMill analysis |
|
20.0 pts |
||
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2nd philosopher’s analysis |
|
20.0 pts |
||
Total Points: 75.0 |
We've got everything to become your favourite writing service
Money back guarantee
Your money is safe. Even if we fail to satisfy your expectations on your paper, our money back guarantee allows you to request a refund.
Confidentiality
We don’t our clients private information with anyone. What happens on our website remains confidential.
Our service is legit
We always keep our word and follow every instruction on order, and this kind of academic assistance is perfectly legitimate.
Get a plagiarism-free paper
We check every paper for plagiarism before submission, so you get a unique paper written for your particular purposes.
We can help with urgent tasks
Need a paper tomorrow? We can write it even while you’re sleeping. Place an order now and get your paper in 4 hours.
Pay a fair price
Our prices depend on urgency of your paper. If you want a cheap essay, place your order in advance. Our prices start from $11 per page.