South University At Home Care Risk Total Quality Improvement Program Paper Part 1: Write a 2–3 page evaluation of the quality improvement program that you

South University At Home Care Risk Total Quality Improvement Program Paper Part 1:

Write a 2–3 page evaluation of the quality improvement program that you have created. This should be the annual summary of the hypothetical data. Make sure your hypothetical data are credible.

Part 2:

Prepare a total quality improvement program, with a focus on “at home care risk”.

Make necessary adjustments to your document so that each segment flows smoothly into the next. Evaluate your project using the criteria given below.

Are the indicators and their measurements appropriate to the high-risk area? Do the indicators capture the risk?
Are the fictional incidents realistic and plausible?
Is the filled chart consistent with the fictional incident?
Is the plan of correction feasible? Will it prevent the occurrence of the incident in future?
How do you know the plan worked? What measures will you use to identify effectiveness?

Include an introduction, conclusion and reference page to this assignment.

For your reference 🙂

This paper is related to the document you helped me with. The 3 incidents we discussed were the current innovations in technology for at home care, aides administrating an overdose and upon dispensing them the victim did not positively respond to opiate cravings and the establishment of charity organizations that has attracted the increased application of volunteer caregivers within society.

Attached bellow is the chart I created for one the questions I asked.

Standards

Severity of Risks

Performance indicator

Level of performance / threshold

Completion in percentage

status

Plan of correction

Qtr. 1

Qtr. 2

Qtr. 3

Qtr. 4

IC: surveillance, Prevention, and Control of Infection

H

Number of individuals observed wearing infection controlling equipment’s like gloves

accessibility

40

30

20

60

continuous

Printing the document that will act as a reference of the instruction when placing the plan of correction on the CMS-2567

EC; management of the environment

M

The number of the campaign raised on environmental management

responsiveness

30

50

60

80

systematic

Photocopying the original deficiency after receiving it

LD (Leadership)

M/H

The quality and dedication of the leaders

Collaboration

40

30

20

90

continuous

Including five specific points for the plan to be acceptable

HR

Human Resource management

H

The recruitment and training process

decisiveness

60

50

70

80

continuous

Proper formatting of the dates, margins and the tabs

MM:

Medication management

L

Physicians undertake handling techniques

delegation

60

70

80

90

systematic

Reference from the health facilities